On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Richard Melville < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 28 October 2015 at 09:28, Emanuele Rusconi <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 28 October 2015 at 06:36, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Bryan Kadzban wrote: > >>> > >>> Craig Garner wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Index: creat-comm.xml > >>> > >>> > >>> Er, not being a lawyer I'm not completely sure, but I would be *very* > >>> careful > >>> changing any license text. Having the license be anything other than > >>> exactly > >>> equivalent to the original seems like a potential issue to me, given > the > >>> number of jurisdictions it has to apply to and the work that the > Creative > >>> Commons people have already done. > >> > >> > >> Yes, we will leave that one alone. > >> > >> -- Bruce > > > > Besides, "synching" and "copyrightable" are perfectly valid spellings > > (as "behaviour" is, by the way, which has been "corrected" in another > > chapter). > > Furthermore, "copyrightable" exists as a genuine word in common > parlance, whereas "copyright-able" does not, and has just been > constructed on the fly by the OP. > > Richard > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > Okay. I'll leave those alone. Make sense.
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
