dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS.
It would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X
implementation.
What I had in mind is a base LFS system with the following: [...]
Sounds good!
What else?
if uncluding mc, then its dependencies - at least glib and libffi.
libssh2 has been handy here too (for virtual sftp file system support),
though I recognize it is not even in the book :-(
Yes, of course the dependent libraries must be included. I was just
listing end user utilities.
if not including any graphics library, what's the advantage of links over
lynx? Just personal preference?
For the little I use them, they are equivalent. Is there a reason to
prefer one over the other?
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
