> We'll just wait for the full release. I suspect it is just a small change > in one file. > > > -- Bruce > > > I will wait. I still beleave it would beter to have gcc 6.2 integrated in the next stable version but I can also understand the risk of big adaption on the blfs packages side... unless ... -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
- Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-6.2.0-RC-20160815 Douglas R. Reno
- Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-6.2.0-RC-20160815 Romain GEISSLER
- Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-6.2.0-RC-20160815 Romain GEISSLER
- Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-6.2.0-RC-20160815 Douglas R. Reno
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Bruce Dubbs
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Bruce Dubbs
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Bruce Dubbs
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Bruce Dubbs
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze akhiezer
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze akhiezer
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Mohammed Alkindi
- Re: [lfs-dev] Package Freeze Thierry Nuttens
