On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:17 AM Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
I have to disagree with this. Your way is ideologically pure, but difficult to implement. In addition, the advantages are only theoretical. What we have now works quite well. It's not broken and I don't want to fix something not broken. It could be argued that since you were obligated to add the switch, the proof exists that there is a 'broken' environment, at least from the standpoint of considering all that is already done to try to isolate chapter 5. Difficult to implement? No, not really. It's adding one executable in chapter 5 to override a possible working pkg-config on the host. Difficult to test? Probably. At least, it's certainly more effort. But, I agree, it's not a major issue. Just thought I'd mention it as I noticed it. JH
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
