On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:40:07PM +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 10:25:20AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On 10/7/19 9:00 AM, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 08:41:45PM +0800, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
> > >
> > > (one comment)
> > > >
> > > > One thing that I have noted, whilst creating the above:
> > > >
> > > > 1) Use of the term "GPL Ghostscript" in the LFS Book
> > > >
> > > > In the BLFS Book, the package section title is just
> > > > "ghostscript-9.27", with a lower-case "g" and no "GPL",
> > > > and although the term "GPL Ghostscript" is used within
> > > > the section, there's no note as to why it's referred to
> > > > as "GPL Ghostscript".
> > > >
> [...]
> > >
> > > So I think we should just call it Ghostscript everywhere.
> >
> > Thanks for the research Ken. I agree.
> >
> > -- Bruce
>
> OK, I'll take a look at both the LFS and BLFS books in a little
> while.
>
Done, r11684 and r22220.
--
Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather
boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth.
- Unseen Academicals
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
