Kevin Buckley wrote: > 1) Use of the term "GPL Ghostscript" in the LFS Book
> In the BLFS Book, the package section title is just > "ghostscript-9.27", with a lower-case "g" and no "GPL", > and although the term "GPL Ghostscript" is used within > the section, there's no note as to why it's referred to > as "GPL Ghostscript". As I understand there are two versions of Ghostscript available from Artifex Software, the current maintainer. I can imagine that the original author of the BLFS page felt the need to distinguish between the two. It appears that you can't tell the difference from just the release number. I don't know what the differences are for I have never used the commercial version. https://www.ghostscript.com/doc/current/Readme.htm#Two_Ghostscripts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostscript#History -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
