On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +0000, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> > I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been
> > offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0.
> >
> > Technically, the JS build does not appear to contain any security
> > fixes, just one or two lines of python got changed. But
> > firefox-78.8.0 does contain the usual crop of fixes rated as 'high'.
> >
> > Firefox has not yet been tagged, so no problem.
> >
> > I'd like to promote JS-78.8.0 for 10.1 so that we continue to use
> > the same version of the tarball. Although I have not yet built this
> > version of firefox on 10.1, I have built and measured on a system
> > from 6th February with various later updates, and I've now got JS
> > 78.8.0 running on two machines which have not yet got as far as
> > firefox.
>
> FWIIW, js78 is a dependency of:
> - polkit: tagged
> - gjs: not tagged yet
>
> According to Xi Ruoyao, nothing dependent on polkit uses js. I'd say we
> need to test gjs (not tagged yet), and its dependencies (g-ir
> (optional), gnome-shell, libsecret (optional), gnome-maps, and gnome-
> weather)
>
> Pierre
>
I've built polkit as part of my normal builds, as well as
gobject-introspection. I normally build very little of gnome.
ĸen
--
When someone told me I lived in a
fantasy land I nearly fell off my unicorn.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
