On 2/24/21 12:13 PM, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 03:48:05AM +0000, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +0000, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been
offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0.
Technically, the JS build does not appear to contain any security
fixes, just one or two lines of python got changed. But
firefox-78.8.0 does contain the usual crop of fixes rated as 'high'.
Firefox has not yet been tagged, so no problem.
I'd like to promote JS-78.8.0 for 10.1 so that we continue to use
the same version of the tarball. Although I have not yet built this
version of firefox on 10.1, I have built and measured on a system
from 6th February with various later updates, and I've now got JS
78.8.0 running on two machines which have not yet got as far as
firefox.
FWIIW, js78 is a dependency of:
- polkit: tagged
- gjs: not tagged yet
According to Xi Ruoyao, nothing dependent on polkit uses js. I'd say we
need to test gjs (not tagged yet), and its dependencies (g-ir
(optional), gnome-shell, libsecret (optional), gnome-maps, and gnome-
weather)
Pierre
I've built polkit as part of my normal builds, as well as
gobject-introspection. I normally build very little of gnome.
Question: were those tested before JS78.7.1 was tagged ?
In my case they were tested after JS78.7.1 was tagged
-- Bruce
I see that Doug has been given the ticket for JS, I'll temporarily
separate the entities to keep JS at 78.7.1.
ĸen
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
