Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 2/2/06, David Fix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Not true. Support for kernel features is the responsibility of the >> > user application. I run Beagle with inotify support, and I don't have >> > inotify support in linux-libc-headers. >> > >> >> Ah, ok. :) Thanks for letting me know about that. :) > > No problem. It's all part of the weirdness of kernel headers. Just > because our glibc wasn't built with inotify support doesn't mean that > an application can't access an available kernel feature. It's just up > to the user app to handle this interface. For instance, Beagle > includes inotify.h in it's source tree and has runtime detection to > see if inotify is available.
Yes, this recent thread covers the issue: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-January/msg01362.html Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
