On 4/25/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I always get the same results as I don't install /usr/local either. > > In fact, why does LFS? It isn't used, why add it? > > I asked years ago why LFS adds /usr/local/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf and > never got an answer. I think we should ditch it, but oh well, perhaps > there's some historical value to it.
I think it's a combination of FHS compliance and convenience. I've actually come around on /usr/local a bit, so far as having it there by default. It's a simple enough thing to ignore that it doesn't bother me too much. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
