On 4/26/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/25/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I always get the same results as I don't install /usr/local either. > > > > In fact, why does LFS? It isn't used, why add it? > > > > I asked years ago why LFS adds /usr/local/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf and > > never got an answer. I think we should ditch it, but oh well, perhaps > > there's some historical value to it. > > I think it's a combination of FHS compliance and convenience. I've > actually come around on /usr/local a bit, so far as having it there by > default. It's a simple enough thing to ignore that it doesn't bother > me too much. > > -- > Dan
Nah, i hate the /usr/local dir, but just in case a program installs itself there, i symlinked it to /usr :) Tijnema -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
