Alexander Haley wrote:
> * The union FS page (http://www.filesystems.org/project-unionfs.html) > has a link to a number of unionfs examples, > (http://www.linux-live.org/unionfs/) which in fact turns out to be a > fellow's private tirade against unionFS and suggests using AUFS due to > excessive crashes ... > Not attempting to defend this - and I've no personal experience with UnionFS since it was very, very pre-release - but FWIW, that fellow (Tomas M) is the maintainer for Slax Linux (http://www.slax.org), which depends heavily on a union-style filesystem (i.e., UnionFS or AuFS)... so I'm willing to trust his judgment on this one. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
