Gordon Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not attempting to defend this - and I've no personal experience with > UnionFS since it was very, very pre-release - but FWIW, that fellow > (Tomas M) is the maintainer for Slax Linux (http://www.slax.org), which > depends heavily on a union-style filesystem (i.e., UnionFS or AuFS)... > so I'm willing to trust his judgment on this one.
I have used Slax a bit throughout the years, and it seemed as though a lot of the bugs were due to problems with UnionFS, where Tomas would have to wait for them to fix stuff. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
