> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:03:08 +0000 (GMT)
> From: ga ho <[email protected]>
> Subject: LFS 6.5 Chapter 5.4. Binutils-2.19.1 - Pass 1
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> It states in chapter 5.4:
>
> If building on x86_64, create a symlink to ensure the
> sanity of the toolchain:
>
> case $(uname -m) in
> x86_64) mkdir -v /tools/lib && ln -sv lib
> /tools/lib64 ;;
> esac
>
> I just want to confirm. Do I still need to do this If I am
> building the 32 bit version of LFS on a 64bit machine or
> does it only apply when building the 64bit version on a
> 64bit machine?
>
> Thanks
> Gary
>
>--------------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:44:16 +0800
> From: Hugh <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: LFS 6.5 Chapter 5.4. Binutils-2.19.1 - Pass 1
> To: LFS Support List <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> According to my understanding on the sentence, you should
> create the
> symlink as long as your CPU is(supports) x86_64. I created
> that
> symlink when building lfs x86 32bit on a core2 duo cpu
> intel T5870.
> All seems ok.
>
> Thus I recommend that you create the symlink.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hugh
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:43:45 -0500
> From: William Immendorf <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: LFS 6.5 Chapter 5.4. Binutils-2.19.1 - Pass 1
> To: [email protected],
> LFS Support List
> <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> > Thus I recommend that you create the symlink.
> Unless you are doing multilib, which is recommened.
>
> William
Thanks, that's put my mind at rest.
Regards,
Gsry
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
