On 11/05/2009 04:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Chris Staub wrote:
>> On 11/05/2009 03:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> First mistake. Change the symlink
>>>
>> No need for that...long as /bin/bash is specified for the LFS user.
>
> I'm not sure about that Chris. That means that no script will ever
> invoke sh. IIRC, glibc is especailly bad about having bashisms in sh
> scripts.
>
I have built LFS using /bin/sh -> dash (and /usr/bin/awk -> mawk)
recently with no problems. I know Glibc has had problems before with
using bashisms but not specifying Bash, but that has been fixed. Don't
really know what you mean by "no script will ever invoke sh".
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
