On 11/24/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > linux fan wrote: >> Intending to umount and roll back, I get: >> >> df -ha >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >> /dev/sda11 11G 7.6G 2.7G 74% / >> /proc 0 0 0 - /proc >> sysfs 0 0 0 - /sys >> devpts 0 0 0 - /dev/pts >> tmpfs 760M 0 760M 0% /dev/shm >> /dev/sdd10 5.1G 2.0G 2.9G 40% /mnt/lfs >> /dev 760M 240K 759M 1% /mnt/lfs/dev >> devpts 0 0 0 - /mnt/lfs/dev/pts >> shm 760M 0 760M 0% /mnt/lfs/dev/shm >> proc 0 0 0 - /mnt/lfs/proc >> sysfs 0 0 0 - /mnt/lfs/sys >> r...@lfs:~# umount /mnt/lfs/sys >> r...@lfs:~# umount /mnt/lfs/proc >> r...@lfs:~# umount /mnt/lfs/dev/shm >> r...@lfs:~# umount /mnt/lfs/dev/pts >> r...@lfs:~# umount /mnt/lfs/dev >> r...@lfs:~# umount /mnt/lfs >> >> umount /mnt/lfs >> Segmentation fault >
Just out of curiosity, they are looking into this kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125880707213275&w=2 which happens after (re)building glibc and test, and then doing umount. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
