William Immendorf wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Mykal Funk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I can say it isn't the hardware. I recompiled the kernel with >> CONFIG_HZ_100 option set, then rebooted with that kernel. I started the >> glibc build from 5.7.1 and 12 hours later under high load the clock is >> still accurate. Problem fixed. Thanks for the ideas, folks. They helped >> me to learn which is the most important thing in my book. >> > Thing is, is that you mentioned that you had other computers. Which > ones are they? > > Don't let Johnylee distract you. > William, I use a 900 MHz Intel Celeron netnook running XP for school. My wife uses a 2 GHz dual-core Acer laptop dual-booting Ubuntu 9.10 & Windows 7. I had built an LFS 6.3 for that machine, but the wife like Ubuntu better. I'm not stuck in the stone age, but I like my antiques, of which I have a number. Including this 486 which has a host system of LFS 5.?
Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
