linux fan wrote: > On 12/14/09, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Try the fix Ken suggested (CONFIG_HZ_100) and make sure you turn off the >> SMP option. That has a lot of extra code you don't need I am currently building a new kernel for the host system. It should finish later today. I'll then test the timekeeping system with a compile of glibc, which is likely to take a day or so. I'll let folks know if the CONFIG_HZ_100 option worked. > Is there a way to 'nice' the build so that it doesn't use all 100% cpu? > > I would hate to have to 'nice' the process. An SBU equals about 150 minutes. It takes long enough to compile without being 'nice'. > Does the clock moving only a tick or two during the entire build break it? >
No, it doesn't seem to break the build. It's just annoying. Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
