On 02/03/10 22:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Justin P. Mattock wrote: >> On 02/03/10 20:25, brown wrap wrote: >>> Yesterday I thought I had made it through pass one. That was probably >>> because any of the compiles I made didn't require the tests being run. >>> So today I started off with pass 2, and the I think it was glibc failed >>> right off the bat. So when I saw the new release of 6.6, I thought I'd >>> start all over with it. Now I can't get gcc to compile: >>> >>> checking for x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc... >>> /mnt/lfs/sources/6.6/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc >>> -B/mnt/lfs/sources/6.6/gcc-build/./gcc/ >>> -B/tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/lib/ >>> -isystem /tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/include -isystem >>> /tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/sys-include >>> checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in >>> `/mnt/lfs/sources/6.6/gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc': >>> configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile >>> See `config.log' for more details. >>> make[1]: *** [configure-target-libgcc] Error 1 >>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/6.6/gcc-build' >>> make: *** [all] Error 2 > >> if your wanting to build an x86_64 look at clfs >> there you choose if you want pure64 or multilib > > No, that's not necessary. You only need to follow those instructions if > you are trying to do 32->64 or want to build a multi-lib system. > > I'm currently building 6.6-rc1 as a pure 64-bit system, its working on > Chapter 6 GCC now. The GCC build was fine. It's doing the tests. There > are no problems so far. The only requirement is to start from a 64-bit > distro (and to follow directions). > > -- Bruce > > >
yeah!! your right.. I figured clfs would be more suitable (especially if they decide to build /lib64 and only lib64(like fedora)); main concern though is the dynamic linker Justin P. Mattock -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
