On 02/03/10 23:16, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Justin P. Mattock wrote: > >> yeah!! your right.. > > http://www.wikihow.com/Use-You're-and-Your
well I'm not here to have a pissing contest, nor bagg on people nor be bagged on.. > >> I figured clfs would be more suitable > > Suitable for what? > gcc i.g. multilib non multilib sitiations!! >> (especially if they decide to build /lib64 and >> only lib64(like fedora)); > > LFS makes a symlink > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Feb 3 23:07 lib64 -> lib > > So it doesn't matter which library the build process tries to use. > >> main concern though is the dynamic linker > > What concern is that? When you don't know what you are saying, it's > better to say nothing. > > -- Bruce I guess.. (total buzz kill you are(oh-well); Justin P. Mattock -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
