Alex Bosworth wrote: > Here's the synopsis: > > Been trying to compile LFS (from the latest svn version) on my laptop, I have > tried four times so far (please note I'm making use of JHLAFS). During all > the > four builds, gcc tests don't seem to be satisfactory as the number of > unexpected > failures is too high and the number of expected passes is too low. I have > tried > changing the CFLAGS and tried to be conservative but, the result seems to be > the > same. The fourth time I chose to run tests both for the tools and the final > system. As I can see tests for all other packages are successful (All # tests > were successful) except for gcc ! The CFLAGS I used for the fourth build are > "-O3 -pipe -msse -msse2 -mmmx -march=native -mtune=native". The processor is > an > Intel Penitum4 Mobile. > > The only deviations from the SVN book are m4 (using 1.4.16), mpc (using > 0.9), > less (using 446). > > Here's the "grep -A7 Summ" output:
> === g++ Summary === > > # of expected passes 6 > # of unexpected failures 3543 I agree that this number of failures is way too high. Since you are using jhalfs, the problem is not a typo. I would suspect a hardware problem of some kind. Do you have enough free memory or diskspace? Can you duplicate the problme on another system? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
