Alex Bosworth wrote:
> I don't know a lot about linux scheduler, but I believe that it would make a
> difference as, setting a lower priority means less time slice allocated to
> the
> process thus, in turn reduces the frequency the process is scheduled. On the
No, it means that if there are other (higher priority) processes waiting
for the CPU, it'll give it up. If there aren't other such processes,
then it makes no difference.
[...]
[...]
> First, I am gonna try recompile manually to see if jhalfs setting some
> unfavorable flags and thus making the test fail (I doubt that!). If that
> fails,
> I'm gonna download and run prime95 to see how the hardware fares.
You might also consider memtest, though prime95 is a good choice
to check for heat problems.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
