On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:38:03AM -0700, bsquared wrote: > > I tried to recreate the directory per ch. 5.10 instructions and it > > failed complaining about gmp.h also. However, I don't know if the > > toolchain adjustment has any effect. I may have to wipe /tools and > > start over. > > > > I was able to recreate the gcc-build directory, and the build still > failed with the same error. > > Any ideas are appreciated. > Your first post showed that configure had referenced libselinux as well as libgmp. I would expect coreutils' configure script to decide that libgmp was NOT present.
Please read the penultimate 3 paragraphs of section 5.2, "Toolchain Technical Notes". You should have changed the specs file in section 5.8 so that the linker in /tools/lib is used. Then, in the second pass of binutils you should have passed --with-lib-path=/tools/lib to avoid using the host's linker. There are also a host of things that we do in pass 2 of gcc, but my guess is that you missed something in the second pass of binutils. Alternatively, using an existing source or -build directory left over from pass 1 would probably cause this sort of problem. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
