On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:38:03AM -0700, bsquared wrote: >> > I tried to recreate the directory per ch. 5.10 instructions and it >> > failed complaining about gmp.h also. However, I don't know if the >> > toolchain adjustment has any effect. I may have to wipe /tools and >> > start over. >> > >> >> I was able to recreate the gcc-build directory, and the build still >> failed with the same error. >> >> Any ideas are appreciated. >> > Your first post showed that configure had referenced libselinux as > well as libgmp. I would expect coreutils' configure script to > decide that libgmp was NOT present. > > Please read the penultimate 3 paragraphs of section 5.2, "Toolchain > Technical Notes". You should have changed the specs file in section > 5.8 so that the linker in /tools/lib is used. Then, in the second > pass of binutils you should have passed --with-lib-path=/tools/lib > to avoid using the host's linker. > > There are also a host of things that we do in pass 2 of gcc, but my > guess is that you missed something in the second pass of binutils. > > Alternatively, using an existing source or -build directory left > over from pass 1 would probably cause this sort of problem. > > ĸen > -- > das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page >
Thanks Ken. I may have missed something. I was having problems getting started due to a typo (previous post), and may have erred when trying to pick up the ball. I'll just restart, and hopefully catch what was missed. -- Thank you, -Brian -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
