thats what I thought you were supposed to do but for some reason I thought that was a bad idea
On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:11:23AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote: >> aha, >> >> once again, >> >> dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/usr/src/gcc-build $ gcc --version >> gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 >> >> dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/usr/src/gcc-build $ apt-get >> >> I knew I figured this out once before, and the reason I knew is because I >> removed the -fbuilding-libgcc (just now and before) from the makefile and >> came to this problem) >> >> cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=gnu++11’ >> >> which has to do with the fact that cc1plus 4.6 doesn't have support for that >> ;) odd that they didn't include the build process for compiling 4.7 from 4.6 >> huh? >> > Ah ha! You are using the host's compiler in pass 2. Wrong path, > failed to correctly specify a variable, omitting +h, or something > else. > > The first pass of gcc builds a pseudo cross-compiler, hence the LFS > setting : just enough of a name change to fool the build system into > using the cross-compile routines (for separation from the host). > This compiler only supports 'C'. > > The second pass uses the 'cross' compiler to build a native C and > C++ compiler. > > ĸen > -- > das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
