On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote: > On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote: > >> the configure should be: >> >> ./configure --disable-nologin >> >> as nologin was previously installed by shadow > > Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's? If so, that is > desired because util-linux ships a better nologin binary.
I am using rpm package manager. It causes a conflict when a file is already installed by another package. You then have to remove one of them from one of the packages. > > Coreutils will also overwrite groups program because it is better than > shadow's groups binary. There isn't a "groups" executeable installed by shadow. I could list the files installed by shadow and coreutils here if needed > > > Rather, shadow, if not wanting to install groups or nologin installed, > could edit Makefile.in to exclude those. On my builds I just rm the duplicate file from one of the packages before it is packaged up by rpm so I don't have to edit any of the Makefiles. For the book the later package will over write the earlier package, and you will not know the over write has occurred. > > Sincerely, > > WIlliam Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
