On 10/07/2014 09:23 AM, Simon Geard wrote: > On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 19:56 +0200, Tim Tassonis wrote: >> My question for future installation is: >> >> Are there known problems if I integrate pam already in the initial lfs >> install, not then having to reinstall shadow and libcap. I would then >> change the lfs installation order to: > > Yes, that's what I've been doing for years. If you're going to install > PAM, there's no need to do things the LFS way, then re-install several > packages afterwards. > > I can't remember if the BLFS instructions need modifying much (it's been > a long time since I followed the books closely), but it shouldn't be too > hard to make any necessary adaptation... > > Simon. >
Thanks a lot, I guess the blfs instruction should work, they differ to the lfs instructions mainly by ensuring that pam is used and in the case of shadow, install all the neccessary pam configs. Kind regards Tim -- decentral.ch - IT Stuff Tim Tassonis Dennlerstasse 36 8047 Zürich st...@decentral.ch +41 79 229 36 17 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
