I changed the subject line as requested.
>
> For one failure, I'd ignore it and continue.
>
I notice your test cases were build for x86_64, mine for i686. As I
said, I did a C&P into a wrapper script, but my error causes the "make
check" to drop out. That alone makes it seem pretty important. I did
a diff with your test cases, and most of it isn't alarming, but I have
this:
-----------------------8<...........
Test Run By root on Sat Nov 22 18:27:58 2014
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running target unix
Using /tools/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description
file$
Using /tools/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file
for$
Using
/usr/local/src/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/config/default.exp$
Running
/usr/local/src/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-abi/ab$
FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check <----------------
Running
/usr/local/src/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/con$
Running
/usr/local/src/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-pretty$
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 8756
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 43
# of unsupported tests 197
make[4]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/usr/local/src/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/l$
make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[3]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
-----------------------8<...........
Seems to me the ABI check is rather important. (First time through I
did try installing anyway, but then building e2fsprogs died in a
mysterious way, so I backed-up to rebuilding GCC.) I think I need to
to find a fix for this. Any ideas? (TIA, as always.)
--
Paul Rogers
[email protected]
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
