Daniel Mrvoš wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 11:04 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 09:06:50AM +0200, Daniel Mrvoš wrote:
...
# FAIL: 1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
Yes, this is normal. There seems to be something in udev.pl which
causes that to indicate a failure, even though none of the
individual tests there actually fail.
It's not normal. The reference build has no failures.
...
Are the tests being run in chroot with all virtual filesystems mounted?
Yup.
{~}-> echo $LFS
/srv/lfs
{~}-> mount -v
devtmpfs on /srv/lfs/dev type devtmpfs
(rw,relatime,size=1016348k,nr_inodes=254087,mode=755)
devpts on /srv/lfs/dev/pts type devpts (rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620)
proc on /srv/lfs/proc type proc (rw,relatime)
sysfs on /srv/lfs/sys type sysfs (rw,relatime)
tmpfs on /srv/lfs/run type tmpfs (rw,relatime)
{~}-> chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i HOME=/root TERM=$TERM
PS1='\u:\w\$ '
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin /tools/bin/bash --login
That all looks correct. About the only other thing I can think of is some sort
of kernel issue. I don't kno what it would be though. The host using selinux
perhaps? But that is just speculation.
One way to check is after you boot to LFS, rebuild and test eudev, but skip the
install.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
