On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Hazel Russman wrote: > The explanation of the configuration parameters for libstdc++ includes the > lines: > --disable-libstdcxx-threads > Since we have not built the thread C library, the C++ one cannot be built > as well. > > This should read "the C++ one cannot be built *either*" or, alternatively > "we must inhibit the build of the C++ one as well". > > Sorry for pedantry ;-) >
Hi Hazel, I'm rejoicing over your correct use of "alternatively" instead of "alternately" (I hate when I see people using the (incorrect) alternative usage in this context). BTW, now, I'm wondering if it was right to use "rejoice" above. Should I have said "I'm joicing over ..." because, at least today, I saw "alternatively" for the first time ??? Anyway, cheers and "Happy ...", -- Alex
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
