I install bison in the host system and try to recompile: ... checking for bison... bison checking version of bison... 3.0.2, ok checking for libc-friendly stddef.h... yes checking whether we need to use -P to assemble .S files... no checking for .set assembler directive... no checking for assembler gnu_unique_object symbol type... yes checking for .previous assembler directive... yes checking for .protected and .hidden assembler directive... yes checking whether __attribute__((visibility())) is supported... no configure: error: compiler support for visibility attribute is required
But again when I try to "make": lfs@joao:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ make make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. 2015-04-12 17:52 GMT-03:00 Ken Moffat <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 04:20:25PM -0300, João wrote: > > Hey guys, newbie here... > > > > LFS version: LFS 7.7 > > Host System: Elementary OS Freya 64 bits (Ubuntu 14.04 based) > > > > I'm having problems with the installation of glibc-2.21 in the chapter > 5.7 > > of LFS 7.7. When I run the 'make' command to compile the package it just > > return the output: > > > > lfs@joao:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ make > > make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. > > > > That is because configure failed, as you show us below. In general, > if a command finished by reporting an error, you need to stop and > diagnose the problem (or ask on the list). > > In the previous step, when I prepare Glibc for compilation with the > > commands: > > > > ../glibc-2.21/configure \ > > --prefix=/tools \ > > --host=$LFS_TGT \ > > --build=$(../glibc-2.21/scripts/config.guess) \ > > --disable-profile \ > > --enable-kernel=2.6.32 \ > > --with-headers=/tools/include \ > > libc_cv_forced_unwind=yes \ > > libc_cv_ctors_header=yes \ > > libc_cv_c_cleanup=yes > > > > the output returned is: > > > [ snipping most of this, the problems are near the end ] > > checking for install-info... /usr/bin/install-info > > checking for bison... no > > You need to check the 'host system requirements' at the end of the > Preface, and then change things (e.g. the /bin/sh symlink on those > systems derived from debian which default to dash), add missing > packages, or even update package versions if they are too old. And > ensure that awk is gawk. > > checking for libc-friendly stddef.h... yes > > checking whether we need to use -P to assemble .S files... no > > checking for .set assembler directive... no > > checking for assembler gnu_unique_object symbol type... yes > > checking for .previous assembler directive... yes > > checking for .protected and .hidden assembler directive... yes > > checking whether __attribute__((visibility())) is supported... no > > configure: error: compiler support for visibility attribute is required > > That sounds like a too-old compiler, except you are using the new > LFS compiler. Google found a recent match at linux questions which > attributed it to using dash as sh. I recommend that you fix up all > the host system requirements, and then begin again ('start over' as > the Americans say) because there is a small possibility that > binutils or gcc have been miscompiled (wrong options generated by > configure) when the host system was inadequate. > > ĸen > -- > Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. > Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style >
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
