On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 06:04:25PM -0300, João Paulo Saragossa wrote: > I install bison in the host system and try to recompile: > > ... > checking for bison... bison > checking version of bison... 3.0.2, ok > checking for libc-friendly stddef.h... yes > checking whether we need to use -P to assemble .S files... no > checking for .set assembler directive... no > checking for assembler gnu_unique_object symbol type... yes > checking for .previous assembler directive... yes > checking for .protected and .hidden assembler directive... yes > checking whether __attribute__((visibility())) is supported... no > configure: error: compiler support for visibility attribute is required >
And your new build is still broken. Either: (a) you have omitted other things from the host system requirements or (b) you will have to start again, because the inadequate host system has built inadequate versions of binutils or gcc. Also, please do NOT top-post on these lists - just because mickeysoft and google think it is the way to handle email does not mean that we like it : in our bottom-posting mails we put various comments after the text to which they refer. > But again when I try to "make": > > lfs@joao:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ make > make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. > Because you are are still trying to run make after configure failed with an error. If you are in any doubt if a command succeeded, use 'echo $?' as the next command. 0 is ok, 1 is not. > > > > You need to check the 'host system requirements' at the end of the > > Preface, and then change things (e.g. the /bin/sh symlink on those > > systems derived from debian which default to dash), add missing > > packages, or even update package versions if they are too old. And > > ensure that awk is gawk. Note that ALL of the requirements need to be present. So go back and check the host system requirements again. If you do not understand any of the results, please ask. Otherwise, begin again. > > > > Do not top post on this list. > > hint: read the whole reply - in this case, you would not have top-posted your reply. ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
