08.10.2015 17:48, je Hazel Russman napisal
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:11:16 +0000 (UTC)
<[email protected]> wrote:
8. Oct 2015 15:54 by [email protected]:
> 08.10.2015 15:25, je Pierre Labastie napisal
>> On 08/10/2015 15:12, Jan Bilodjerič wrote:
>>> 08.10.2015 11:56, je >>> [email protected]>>> napisal
>>>> 8. Oct 2015 08:37 by >>>> [email protected]>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>> I am building LFS 7.7 on debian 64-bit system.
>>>>> I am getting un unexpected failure when testing procps-ng-3.3.10
>>>>> (details below).
>>>>>
>>>>> === lib tests ===
>>>>>
>>>>> Schedule of variations:
>>>>> unix
>>>>>
>>>>> Running target unix
>>>>> Using /tools/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description
>>>>> file for target.
>>>>> Using /tools/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file
>>>>> for target.
>>>>> Using ./config/unix.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
>>>>> Running ./lib.test/fileutils.exp ...
>>>>> FAIL: test no space left on device
>>>>> Running ./lib.test/strutils.exp ...
>>>>
>>>> Your partition is probably filled up at this point. Run "df -h" to
>>>> check if you have any space left on the LFS partition. Another
>>>> possibility is the test suite trying to create a large file
>>>> temporarily.
>>>>
>>>> -- Willie
>>>
>>> Output of "df -h" is as follows:
>>>
>>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>>> /dev/sda4 16G 2.6G 13G 18% /
>>> none 2.7G 0 2.7G 0% /dev
>>> none 2.7G 0 2.7G 0% /dev/shm
>>>
>> I do not see your LFS partition above...
>>
>> Pierre
>
> Below is the output of "df -h" on my host:
>
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> udev 10M 0 10M 0% /dev
> tmpfs 1.1G 9.1M 1.1G 1% /run
> /dev/sda2 28G 716M 28G 3% /
> /dev/sda9 19G 7.5G 9.8G 44% /usr
> tmpfs 2.7G 156K 2.7G 1% /dev/shm
> tmpfs 5.0M 4.0K 5.0M 1% /run/lock
> tmpfs 2.7G 0 2.7G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
> /dev/sda4 16G 2.6G 13G 18% /mnt/lfs
> /dev/sda5 55G 14G 39G 26% /home
> /dev/sda6 922M 1.3M 858M 1% /tmp
> /dev/sda1 276M 37M 226M 14% /boot
> /dev/sda7 3.7G 815M 2.7G 24% /var
> tmpfs 536M 8.0K 536M 1% /run/user/132
> tmpfs 536M 12K 536M 1% /run/user/1000
>
> I am kind of wet behind the ears linux user, so I don't know what I'm
> missing.
>
> Jan
>
>
Well that looks good. Looking at the source of the test script I'm not
really
sure what's supposed to happen, afraid I can't help you.
--Willie
Sometimes you get disk full messages because you have run out of
inodes rather than space. It might be worth running df -hi to check on
that.
--
H Russman
Output of df -hi is:
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
udev 667K 411 667K 1% /dev
tmpfs 670K 649 669K 1% /run
/dev/sda2 28M 9.5K 28M 1% /
/dev/sda9 1.2M 320K 873K 27% /usr
tmpfs 670K 8 670K 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 670K 5 670K 1% /run/lock
tmpfs 670K 13 670K 1% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sda1 72K 328 72K 1% /boot
/dev/sda4 1.0M 40K 985K 4% /mnt/lfs
/dev/sda7 239K 15K 225K 6% /var
/dev/sda5 3.5M 26K 3.5M 1% /home
/dev/sda6 60K 28 60K 1% /tmp
tmpfs 670K 11 670K 1% /run/user/132
tmpfs 670K 18 670K 1% /run/user/1000
Should I continue without finding out what is causing test failure?
I am not very comfortable with that. Any ideas?
Jan
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
