Hi,
I got following errors when using the configure command in 5.8:
My host system is Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64

"
...
configure: WARNING: stdbool.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: stdbool.h:     check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: stdbool.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: stdbool.h:     section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled"
configure: WARNING: stdbool.h: proceeding with the compiler's result
checking for stdbool.h... no
checking stdalign.h usability... no
checking stdalign.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: stdalign.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: stdalign.h:     check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: stdalign.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: stdalign.h:     section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled"
configure: WARNING: stdalign.h: proceeding with the compiler's result
checking for stdalign.h... no
checking for the value of EOF... configure: error: computing EOF failed
"
all the previous steps are successful, include dummy.c test in step 5.7:
"
lfs@vm-svr:/mnt/LFS/sources/gcc-build$ echo 'int main(){}' > dummy.c
lfs@vm-svr:/mnt/LFS/sources/gcc-build$ $LFS_TGT-gcc dummy.c
lfs@vm-svr:/mnt/LFS/sources/gcc-build$ readelf -l a.out | grep ': /tools'
      [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
"
I searched around, and found there was an email thread
<http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-support/2014-May/046941.html>
about same problem last year, however there was no solution in that thread
and it seems OP's situation is a bit different from mine (the dummy.c test
failed in his case)

any idea what might be wrong in my case?
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to