Em 14-10-2015 15:33, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 06:04:47PM +0100, Hazel Russman wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:36:45 -0500
>> Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hazel Russman wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have now tried this out on all the systems I run on this machine. The 
>>>> results are as follows:
>>>> OS              Coreutils     terminal    result
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>> Debian          8.13           xterm      exits
>>>> Crux            8.24           xterm      hangs
>>>> LFS7.7          8.23           console    exits
>>>> LFS7.7          8.23           xterm      hangs
>>>> LFS7.7          8.24           console    exits
>>>> LFS7.7          8.24           xterm      hangs
>>>> LFS7.8 (chroot) 8.24           console    exits
>>>> LFS7.8 (chroot) 8.24           xterm      hangs
>>>>
>>>> You can see that version 8.13 of coreutils does not have this bug.
>>>> 8.23 and 8.24 both have it, but only when running in an xterm (and
>>>> 8.23 did not have those tests so it wouldn't have shown up). Did you
>>>> perhaps do your runs in a virtual console?
>>>
>>> I run almost everything over ssh, but I went to my development system 
>>> and ran it in both konsole and xterm on an xfce system and it worked 
>>> properly for me.
>>>
>>> Another wild guess -- a difference in kernel config?
>>>
>>>    -- Bruce
>>
>> Well, it must have something to do with devices. It might be significant 
>> that Crux and LFS are the systems that have home-made kernels; the Debian 
>> one is stock. What settings should I be looking for? A whole kernel config 
>> file is a bit big to post.
>>
>> It would be interesting if a few other people could try this -- see if they 
>> agree with you or with me.
>>
>> Hazel
> 
> I've built 7.8-rc (as it was) four times on real hardware, all
> x86_64.  In each case, my logs show:
> 
> PASS: tests/misc/seq-precision.sh

# cat /etc/lfs-release
SVN-20151002

Linux-4.2.3 (headers).

Same architecture and test PASS.

> 
> I did not keep a note of what sort of term I was using (didn't think
> I'd be asked :) but probably all were using rxvt-unicode - for the
> server, that was over ssh from a desktop box.

LXTerminal, chroot.

> 
> The desktops were variously: from 7.7, from 7.8 (a second system on
> my test box), from June svn.  The server build was from 7.6.

Host: LXQt.

> 
> In the desktop boxes I put a new kernel on the host (similar to what
> I'm going to build for LFS - to try to find out any kernel problems
> before I build the new system) and use that.  For the server, I am
> using a 4.1.8 kernel and the old 7.6 system had already moved to
> 4.1.1.

Host: kernel 4.1.6.

-- 
[]s,
Fernando, aka Sísifo
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to