Em 14-10-2015 12:14, Hazel Russman escreveu:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:11:27 -0500
> Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> 


>> Your analysis makes sense, but I cannot duplicate it.
>>
>> $ seq 1 inf |head; ps -ef && grep seq

Think this is a typo: s/&&/|/.

>> 1
>> 2
>> 3
>> 4
>> 5
>> 6
>> 7
>> 8
>> 9
>> 10
>> bdubbs   28015  6462  0 14:56 pts/3    00:00:00 grep seq

$ seq 1 inf |head; ps -ef | grep seq
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
fernando  6233 27520  0 18:10 pts/0    00:00:00 grep --color=auto seq

LXQt, host now running kernel 4.2.3

$ cat /etc/lfs-release
SVN-20150303

Qterminal.

Same results in the chrooted environment described in the other post.

>>
>> shows that seq is no longer running for me after head exists.  I don't 
>> know why SIGPIPE or EPIPE would be ignored on your system.  The only 
>> place I see both sigaction and PIPE in the source is src/split.c.
>>
>> Just taking a guess, what do you have for 'ulimit -p'?  Mine is 8.
>>
> I have now tried this out on all the systems I run on this machine. The 
> results are as follows:
> OS              Coreutils     terminal    result
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Debian          8.13           xterm      exits
> Crux            8.24           xterm      hangs 
> LFS7.7          8.23           console    exits            
> LFS7.7          8.23           xterm      hangs
> LFS7.7          8.24           console    exits
> LFS7.7          8.24           xterm      hangs
> LFS7.8 (chroot) 8.24           console    exits
> LFS7.8 (chroot) 8.24           xterm      hangs
> 
> You can see that version 8.13 of coreutils does not have this bug. 8.23 and 
> 8.24 both have it, but only when running in an xterm (and 8.23 did not have 
> those tests so it wouldn't have shown up). Did you perhaps do your runs in a 
> virtual console? 
> 
> Ulimit -p was 8 in all cases btw.
> 
> Hazel
> 


-- 
[]s,
Fernando, aka Sísifo
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to