On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:49 PM, William Harrington <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, October 26, 2015 14:06, Michael Havens wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> What you have to do is work out in which directory configure was last > >> run, i.e. identify the *newest* config.log file and then search for > >> 'cannot compute suffix of object files'. Use less or vim to search, > >> e.g. > >> > >> /cannot\ compute\ suffix > >> > >> will probably take you to the right part of the file, then look back > >> at the lines before that - you should see that a code fragment was > >> created, probably with a message related to testing the suffix of > >> object files, and then you should see what happened when configure > >> tried to run that fragment. i.e. A "real" descriptive error. > >> > > > > That was easy..... it was on the line before: > > > > > `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc': > > The config.log which has the error "cannot computer suffix of object > files" is in that directory and you should notice that the configure > script exited with status 1: > > /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc/config.log > > When you go to the line in that log which gives the error, you'll find the > error message either as or ld or gcc gave. > > http://pastebin.com/hBDE6XGf So I am thinking this produced the error (found in the link above): configure:3681: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h */ | #define PACKAGE_NAME "GNU C Runtime Library" | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "libgcc" | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "1.0" | #define PACKAGE_STRING "GNU C Runtime Library 1.0" | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "" | #define PACKAGE_URL "http://www.gnu.org/software/libgcc/"; | /* end confdefs.h. */ | | int | main () | { | | ; | return 0; | } however it may have been any of the following: -- configure:3437: /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc -B/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-b uild/./gcc/ -B/tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/l ib/ -isystem /tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/include -isystem /tools/x86_64-lfs-li nux-gnu/sys-include -V >&5 xgcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-V' xgcc: fatal error: no input files compilation terminated. -- configure:3437: /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc -B/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/ -B/tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/include -isystem /tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/sys-include -qversion >&5 xgcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-qversion' xgcc: fatal error: no input files compilation terminated. -- configure:3695: error: in `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc': configure:3698: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile -- Heck , it might be all of them! Do I need to search any and all errors or is it fix them one at a time until it compiles? You know, I was thinking that maybe this error has something to do with building 64 bit.
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
