On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:23:27PM -0400, Michael Havens wrote:
> /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc/config.log
> http://hastebin.com/jeqocobisa.vbs
> 
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Michael Havens <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >
> >> Hastebin your log http://hastebin.com/
> >>
> >> Use:
> >> /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc/config.log
> >>
> >> We can find the error rather quickly if you post the actual config.log.
> >>

From line 95 :

configure:3655: checking for suffix of object files
configure:3677: /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/
-B/tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/sys-include    -c -g -O2  conftest.c >&5
/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/as: line 106: exec: --: invalid
option
exec: usage: exec [-cl] [-a name] [command [arguments ...]]
[redirection ...]
configure:3681: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME "GNU C Runtime Library"
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "libgcc"
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION "1.0"
| #define PACKAGE_STRING "GNU C Runtime Library 1.0"
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT ""
| #define PACKAGE_URL "http://www.gnu.org/software/libgcc/";
| /* end confdefs.h.  */
| 
| int
| main ()
| {
| 
|   ;
|   return 0;
| }
configure:3695: error: in
`/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc':
configure:3698: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot
compile
See `config.log' for more details.

Well, I've never seen one like that.  Looks like something on line
106 of /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/as

I assume that at this point that 'as' file must be a
script.  Perhaps it is trying to exec a variable.  Is it a script ?
If so, what is the hunk which includes line 106 ?

PS thanks for causing me to remember I needed to work on my changes
to my script which prepares photos for online publication.  It adds
EXIF data from the original, cuts that down and reworks some of it to
match the reduced image/file size, and adds a copyright and a
description - only took 6 hours, a lot of RTFM, and two redesigns :
one of these days I'll get to bed earlier.  Or not.  I suppose I'm a
bash addict :-(

My alternative comment on scripting is the description from the first
course I did on VSAM (Access Method Services - for IBM mainframes) :
"A flexible and powerful tool" - too right, but the considered
description is "It gives you enough rope to hang yourself, and ample
opportunities to do that".

ĸen
-- 
Il Porcupino Nil Sodomy Est! (if you will excuse my latatian)
  aka "The hedgehog song"
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to