> We've never been completely minimalist. Neither am I! But my mantra is KISS; above impatience. I really don't care about boot times. That's never more than a miniscule fraction of my total wait time.
Sytemd definitely violates my idea of KISS! Nobody uses my boxes but me. I've never seen any point to extended attributes, nor ACLs. Just more complications for what gain? > If we were, we'd remove vim, among others. Yeah, I've only used it a few times, under extreme duress. > I'll note that we do not mention LFS packages in BLFS as dependencies > at all, so there may be some BLFS packages that may cause problems is > you skip some LFS packages. Yes, I read that argument in the May '14 list. What is the requirement for attr/acl/libcap in lfs? Systemd was the suggestion I read. But that's not part of lfs--unless that's where LFS is going. Why can't they be installed as part of BLFS? They used to be. > > -- Bruce -- Paul Rogers [email protected] Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) -- http://www.fastmail.com - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
