Here goes:

run: file {/usr,}/lib/libbz2*
> should get exact result:
> /usr/lib/libbz2.so:   symbolic link to `../../lib/libbz2.so.1.0'
> /lib/libbz2.so.1.0:   symbolic link to `libbz2.so.1.0.6'
> /lib/libbz2.so.1.0.6: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1
> (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped
>

root:/sources/bzip2-1.0.6# file {/usr,}/lib/libbz2*
/usr/lib/libbz2.a:    current ar archive
/usr/lib/libbz2.so:   symbolic link to ../../lib/libbz2.so.1.0
/lib/libbz2.so.1.0:   symbolic link to libbz2.so.1.0.6
/lib/libbz2.so.1.0.6: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), dynamically linked, not stripped

Not an exact match. I pick up libbz2.a and the library in the last line is
not stripped in mine.


> run: file /bin/bunzip2
> should get exact result:
> /bin/bunzip2: symbolic link to `bzip2'
>

root:/sources/bzip2-1.0.6# file /bin/bunzip2
/bin/bunzip2: symbolic link to bzip2


> run: readelf -e /bin/bzip2 | grep interpr
> should get exact result:
> [Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
>

root:/sources/bzip2-1.0.6# readelf -e /bin/bzip2 | grep interpr
      [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]

(why is mine going to */tools*?)

run: readelf -d /bin/bzip2 | grep NEEDED
> should get exact result:
>  0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED)             Shared library: [libbz2.so.1.0]
>  0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED)             Shared library: [libc.so.6]
>

root:/sources/bzip2-1.0.6# readelf -d /bin/bzip2 | grep NEEDED
 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED)             Shared library: [libbz2.so.1.0]
 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED)             Shared library: [libc.so.6]

Glenn
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to