Sorry, I didn't copy it, but it was there.A quick history check shows them to
be set before the configure,also I can still echo the output of those variables
and they seem to be correct.So I don't think that was the problem.
I jumped ahead to step 6.65.2 and re-installed util-linux. Then I jumped back
to 6.50.1. It configured with no complaints this time.
Hopefully this won't break everything, but I'm back up to step 6.57.2
(less)with no problems so far.
Ray
From: Chris Staub <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] E2fsprogs
On 08/04/2016 11:42 AM, Ray McCaffity wrote:
> I'm at step 6.50.1 on LFS 7.9 systemd
>
> Everything has been going great, I have been running all of the "make
> checks" when possible.
> But now I'm getting this.
>
> root:/source/e2fsprogs-1.42.13/build# ../configure --prefix=/usr
> --bindir=/bin --with-root-prefix="" --enable-elf-shlibs
> --disable-libblkid --disable-libuuid --disable-uuidd --disable-fsck
> Generating configuration file for e2fsprogs version 1.42.13
> Release date is May, 2015
> checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking for gcc... gcc
> checking whether the C compiler works... yes
> checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
> checking for suffix of executables...
> checking whether we are cross compiling... no
> checking for suffix of object files... o
> checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
> checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
> checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
> checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes
> checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
> checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes
> checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
> checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed
> checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
> checking for additional special compiler flags... (none)
> checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep
> checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
> checking for ANSI C header files... yes
> checking for sys/types.h... yes
> checking for sys/stat.h... yes
> checking for stdlib.h... yes
> checking for string.h... yes
> checking for memory.h... yes
> checking for strings.h... yes
> checking for inttypes.h... yes
> checking for stdint.h... yes
> checking for unistd.h... yes
> checking minix/config.h usability... no
> checking minix/config.h presence... no
> checking for minix/config.h... no
> checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes
> Disabling maintainer mode by default
> Disabling symlinks for install by default
> Disabling relative symlinks for install by default
> Disabling symlinks for build by default
> Disabling verbose make commands
> Disabling compression support by default
> Enabling htree directory support by default
> Enabling ELF shared libraries
> Disabling BSD shared libraries by default
> Disabling profiling libraries by default
> Disabling journal debugging by default
> Disabling blkid debugging by default
> Enabling testio debugging by default
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> checking for uuid_generate in -luuid... no
> configure: error: external uuid library not found
>
>
> My understanding is that this library comes from util-linux. Which I
> installed way back in step 5.33.1
>
> I am using ext4 for most of my file systems in the LFS environment.
>
> /dev/sdb3 on / type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel,data=ordered)
> /dev/sdb1 on /boot type ext2 (rw,relatime,seclabel)
> /dev/sdb4 on /home type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel,data=ordered)
>
>
I don't see this in your configure command:
LIBS=-L/tools/lib \
CFLAGS=-I/tools/include \
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tools/lib/pkgconfig \
If you're following the book, those lines should be right before configure.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
