On 08/04/2016 12:58 PM, Ray McCaffity wrote:
Sorry, I didn't copy it, but it was there.
A quick history check shows them to be set before the configure,
also I can still echo the output of those variables and they seem to be
correct.
So I don't think that was the problem.
I jumped ahead to step 6.65.2 and re-installed util-linux.
Then I jumped back to 6.50.1. It configured with no complaints this time.
Hopefully this won't break everything, but I'm back up to step 6.57.2 (less)
with no problems so far.
Ray
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Chris Staub <[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Thursday, August 4, 2016 9:19 AM
*Subject:* Re: [lfs-support] E2fsprogs
On 08/04/2016 11:42 AM, Ray McCaffity wrote:
I'm at step 6.50.1 on LFS 7.9 systemd
Everything has been going great, I have been running all of the "make
checks" when possible.
But now I'm getting this.
root:/source/e2fsprogs-1.42.13/build# ../configure --prefix=/usr
--bindir=/bin --with-root-prefix="" --enable-elf-shlibs
--disable-libblkid --disable-libuuid --disable-uuidd --disable-fsck
Generating configuration file for e2fsprogs version 1.42.13
Release date is May, 2015
checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables...
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes
checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for additional special compiler flags... (none)
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep
checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking minix/config.h usability... no
checking minix/config.h presence... no
checking for minix/config.h... no
checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes
Disabling maintainer mode by default
Disabling symlinks for install by default
Disabling relative symlinks for install by default
Disabling symlinks for build by default
Disabling verbose make commands
Disabling compression support by default
Enabling htree directory support by default
Enabling ELF shared libraries
Disabling BSD shared libraries by default
Disabling profiling libraries by default
Disabling journal debugging by default
Disabling blkid debugging by default
Enabling testio debugging by default
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for uuid_generate in -luuid... no
configure: error: external uuid library not found
My understanding is that this library comes from util-linux. Which I
installed way back in step 5.33.1
I am using ext4 for most of my file systems in the LFS environment.
/dev/sdb3 on / type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel,data=ordered)
/dev/sdb1 on /boot type ext2 (rw,relatime,seclabel)
/dev/sdb4 on /home type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel,data=ordered)
I don't see this in your configure command:
LIBS=-L/tools/lib \
CFLAGS=-I/tools/include \
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tools/lib/pkgconfig \
If you're following the book, those lines should be right before configure.
If you did have them, you probably forgot the \ after the
"PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tools/lib/pkgconfig". It is very important to enter
the commands in the book exactly as they are.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
