2016-12-23 0:31 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]>: > William Harrington wrote: >> >> On Thu, December 22, 2016 08:15, xinglp wrote: >>> >>> As the below code: >>> case $(uname -m) in >>> x86) ln -s ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 >>> ;; >>> x86_64) ln -s ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64 >>> ln -s ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 >>> ;; >>> esac >>> >>> On my machine, 'uname -m' only output x86_64 or i686, but never x86. >>> When will it output x86 ? >>> >>> Thanks. >> >> >> Hello xinglp, >> >> Uname -m will only output x86 if you reprogram it to output x86. x86 means >> for [456]86. >> >> If clarification is required in the book, then perhaps we can let users >> know x86 isn't the actual output expected from uname, but 486, 586 or 686. > > > Yes, that needs to be changed, but I don't have a 32-bit system any more to > check. > > I suppose it should be: > > case $(uname -m) in > x86_64) > ln -s ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64 > ln -s ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 > ;; > > *) change *) to *86) is better ? > ln -s ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 > ;; > esac > > DJ, can you verify? > > -- Bruce > > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
