On 22/12/2016 17:38, xinglp wrote:
2016-12-23 0:31 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]>:
William Harrington wrote:
On Thu, December 22, 2016 08:15, xinglp wrote:
As the below code:
case $(uname -m) in
x86) ln -s ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-lsb.so.3
;;
x86_64) ln -s ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64
ln -s ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3
;;
esac
On my machine, 'uname -m' only output x86_64 or i686, but never x86.
When will it output x86 ?
Thanks.
Hello xinglp,
Uname -m will only output x86 if you reprogram it to output x86. x86 means
for [456]86.
If clarification is required in the book, then perhaps we can let users
know x86 isn't the actual output expected from uname, but 486, 586 or 686.
Yes, that needs to be changed, but I don't have a 32-bit system any more to
check.
I suppose it should be:
case $(uname -m) in
x86_64)
ln -s ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64
ln -s ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3
;;
*)
change *) to *86) is better ?
In configure scripts, they usually put i?86)
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
