Hazel Russman wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 20:13:30 +0100 Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
wrote:
My log suggests that the ld tests are run from various
ld-descriptivename.exp files, but in the circumstances that is moot.
I just checked my -rc2 log to check my memory, and discovered that
one of the gold tests failed, that got lost in the volume of output.
I've a feeling that is not new.
But like you, the individual flags mean not-a-lot to me (I recognize
cmov, it's what was the difference between i686 and the earlier i589
- although some CPUs from, I think, VIA lacked it, and I recognize a
few others. I'm not particularly aware of the Core2 Duo (I couldn't
justify the cost when they were current), but perhaps it is old
enough to use slow memory.
OK, I finally got back to the same point and ran the binutils tests
again. This time no errors except the expected one for gold
(debug-messg.sh). So it was just a one-off timing problem, nothing
serious. Sorry to take up so much of your time.
We are in the middle of testing for a release. These reports are good,
even if they turn out to be nothing.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
