On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 08:26:49AM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> On 24/08/2017 01:31, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > I don't quite understand how xpg4 could get into the PATH, even if
> > you did install something there. I thought we specified PATH for
> > the lfs user somewhere in the early part of the book, but for your
> > new system it will (hopefully) not exist.
> >
> > ĸen
> >
>
> It's not in PATH: configure has:
> ----
> for as_dir in $PATH$PATH_SEPARATOR/usr/xpg4/bin
> ----
> and then
> ----
> as_fn_error "no acceptable fgrep could be found in
> $PATH$PATH_SEPARATOR/usr/xpg4/bin" "$LINENO" 5
> ----
>
> Pierre
Hi Pierre,
I stand corrected, and I will retract my assertion that the OP
seemed to have been playing with weird|antiquated programs. I'm
actually glad I no longer look at the details of the toolchain any
more, and even more glad that you can spot things like this.
But for grep in /sbin, the suggestion of noting what changed on a
completed system still stands.
ĸen
--
Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather
boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth.
- Unseen Academicals
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
