On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:11:18AM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:52:46PM -0800, Paul Rogers wrote:
> > > If anybody wants to add full retpoline mitigation (against Spectre
> > > v2) to an older system, the following works on x86_64 (I no longer
> > > have i686 systems to test on).
> > 
> > Thank you, Ken.  I do.  I can try it.  I'll report back when I have 
> > information.  I haven't seen any indications yet that the 4.4 & 4.9 kernel 
> > patches install PTI on i686 builds.
> > 
> 
> The i686 patches for that are still being developed, hopefully at
> some point they might be ready for a 4.15-rc, and after that get

I must be living in the past.  I meant they might be ready for a
4.16-rc.

> backported to 4.14 and perhaps to 4.9, 4.4 (depending on how has
> changed).  Best to read that as "in early development".
> 
> > Also, perhaps you can clarify:  The latest kernel patches for 4.4 & 4.9 use 
> > retpoline.  Clearly we *want* both, but I'm confused about whether each 
> > offers any mitigation on its own?
> > 
> 
> PTI offers mitigation against Meltdown, retpoline against Spectre
> v2.
> 
> And by the time there are mitigations for Spectre v1 (currently,
> considerations seem to be particularly focussed on cloud providers
> with heterogenous environments, where a VM can be migrated to a
> newer, or older, machine - but I guess the attacks are more likely
> against VMs shared hosts).
> 
> So again, don't hold your breathe.
> 
> Looks like this will be a fun year, for some definition of fun.
> 
> ĸen
> -- 
> Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather
> boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth.
>                                      - Unseen Academicals
> -- 
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> 
> Do not top post on this list.
> 
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

-- 
Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather
boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth.
                                     - Unseen Academicals
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to