On 05/04/2018 12:38 μμ, Νίκος Λαμπόβας wrote:
On 25 February 2018 at 11:35, Thanos Baloukas <baloukast...@sch.gr
    On 02/25/2018 10:58 AM, Νίκος Λαμπόβας wrote:

        Thank you for the quick answer.
        As said in the email subject the book is LFS, the version is
        7.10 and the Host is a virtual machine with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.
        The Oracle VM Virtualbox is running on Windows 10.

...
snip
...

                 when running make in 6.40 in Perl i get the following
        error a
                 lot of times:

                 sh: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.6:
                 cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

                 Before running make for 6.33 Bash this was the output
        of ldconfig:

                 ldconfig -p | grep libreadline
                       libreadline.so.6 (libc6) => /lib/libreadline.so.6
                       libreadline.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libreadline.so

                 After running make of 6.33 Bash i executed "exec /bin/bash
                 --login +h" as the doc says the new bash with readline
        was in place.

                 root:/# echo $0
                 /bin/bash
                 root:/# ldd /bin/bash
                       linux-gate.so.1 (0xb77c7000)
                       libreadline.so.6 => /lib/libreadline.so.6
        (0xb7783000)
                       libhistory.so.6 => /lib/libhistory.so.6 (0xb7778000)
                       libncursesw.so.6 => /lib/libncursesw.so.6
        (0xb770d000)
                       libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb7708000)
                       libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7551000)
                       /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb77c8000)


    At that point the loader should be the one from /lib and not from
    /tools/lib . Perhaps you did not do
    mv -vf /usr/bin/bash /bin
    on bash installation and /bin/bash is still a link to /tools/bin/bash
    which was created on 'Creating Essential Files and Symlinks'.
    In chroot do
    ls -l /bin/bash /bin/sh



Hi thanos,  "xronia polla" (greek wishes for easter holidays)

Hi Nikos, "xronia polla"

Firstly, is there a reason you are installing the outdated LFS 7.10
and not the latest 8.2? Did you check carefully with version-check.sh
if your ubuntu host fulfills the host system requirements?

I have built lfs all over again until "6.40 perl" for watching all warnings and possible package errors. The commands you mentioned on 'Creating Essential Files and Symlinks' were executed successfully. Also there is no reference of 'tools' in gcc specs file on ' Adjusting the toolchain' and all debug messages for program interpreter are mention /lib/ld-linux.so.2 and not /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2. A strange thing i have noticed is that all binaries of the packages before 6.17 GCC-6.2.0, have correct paths
on ldd command. For example:

   ldd /usr/bin/file
     linux-gate.so.1 (0xb773a000)
     libmagic.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmagic.so.1 (0xb7710000)
     libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0xb76f5000)
     libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb753e000)
     /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb773b000)

But after GCC-6.2.0 all the libraries point to 'tools'. For example:

   ldd /bin/bzip2
     linux-gate.so.1 (0xb7747000)
     libbz2.so.1.0 => not found
     libc.so.6 => /tools/lib/libc.so.6 (0xb758e000)
     /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7748000)

When i execute "LD_DEBUG=libs ldd /usr/bin/file" a binary compiled before GCC-6.2.0 i find that it searches in the beginning the system path that refers to a directory relative to "tools".

LD_DEBUG=libs ldd /usr/bin/file
      11241:    find library=libdl.so.2 [0]; searching
      11241:     search cache=/tools/etc/ld.so.cache
     11241:     search path=/tools/lib/tls/i686/sse2:/tools/lib/tls/i686:/tools/lib/tls/sse2:/tools/lib/tls:/tools/lib/i686/sse2:/tools/lib/i686:/tools/lib/sse2:/tools/lib     (system search path)
      11241:      trying file=/tools/lib/tls/i686/sse2/libdl.so.2
      11241:      trying file=/tools/lib/tls/i686/libdl.so.2
      11241:      trying file=/tools/lib/tls/sse2/libdl.so.2
      11241:      trying file=/tools/lib/tls/libdl.so.2
      11241:      trying file=/tools/lib/i686/sse2/libdl.so.2
      11241:      trying file=/tools/lib/i686/libdl.so.2
      11241:      trying file=/tools/lib/sse2/libdl.so.2
      11241:      trying file=/tools/lib/libdl.so.2
      11241:
      11241:    find library=libc.so.6 [0]; searching
      11241:     search cache=/tools/etc/ld.so.cache
      11241:     search path=/tools/lib        (system search path)
      11241:      trying file=/tools/lib/libc.so.6
      11241:
      11241:    calling init: /tools/lib/libc.so.6
      11241:    calling init: /tools/lib/libdl.so.2
      11241:    initialize program: /bin/bash
      11241:    transferring control: /bin/bash
      11241:
      11241:    find library=libnss_files.so.2 [0]; searching
      11241:     search cache=/tools/etc/ld.so.cache
      11241:     search path=/tools/lib        (system search path)
      11241:      trying file=/tools/lib/libnss_files.so.2
      11241:
      11241:    calling init: /tools/lib/libnss_files.so.2
      11244:    calling fini: /bin/bash [0]
      11244:    calling fini: /tools/lib/libdl.so.2 [0]
      11244:    calling fini: /tools/lib/libnss_files.so.2 [0]
      11244:
      11245:    find library=libmagic.so.1 [0]; searching
      11245:     search cache=/etc/ld.so.cache
      11245:      trying file=/usr/lib/libmagic.so.1
      .
      .
      .

How can i fix this?
What is the output of
ls -l /usr/bin/ldd
and
echo $PATH
in chroot? If /tools/bin precedes /usr/bin you are executing
/tools/bin/ldd

If the  above are ok and you are absolutely sure that ALL the sanity
checks on 6.10 Adjusting the Toolchain and 6.17 GCC-6.2.0 were/are
as the book says, then maybe you missed something when rebooted and
restarted the installation. The critical points are listed in
2.3 Building LFS in Stages. It may be related to installing on a virtual
machine, I have never done that.

--
Thanos
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to