On 07/03/2018 03:13 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 01:44:49PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Having a bit of bad luck with this:
configure:3735: gcc -qversion >&5
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-qversion'; did you mean
'--version'?
gcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
configure:3746: $? = 1
configure:3766: checking whether the C compiler works
configure:3788: gcc conftest.c >&5
configure:3792: $? = 0
configure:3840: result: yes
configure:3843: checking for C compiler default output file name
configure:3845: result: a.out
configure:3851: checking for suffix of executables
configure:3858: gcc -o conftest conftest.c >&5
configure:3862: $? = 0
configure:3884: result:
configure:3906: checking whether we are cross compiling
configure:3914: gcc -o conftest conftest.c >&5
configure:3918: $? = 0
configure:3925: ./conftest
./configure: line 3927: ./conftest: No such file or directory
configure:3929: $? = 127
configure:3936: error: in `/usr/src/Octothorpe/BUILD/file-5.32':
configure:3938: error: cannot run C compiled programs.
If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'.
See `config.log' for more details
Configure doesn't normally produce that amount of output, that looks
as if you have selected certain lines from config.log ?
Yes this is a piece from config.log
I am building in /usr/src/Octothrope/BUILD/ as I am building with rpmbuild.
This has not been a problem in LFS 8.1. I am updating my LFS-8.1 build to
LFS 8.2 and have only changed the difference between the two handbooks.
Any hints to what has occurred?
Sorry, no. I did wonder about "disk full", but if you are running
as root then that only fails when the disk really _is_ full, so
config.log would not have been fully written.
The partition that this is being built on has 20GB of free space. /tmp
is a 16GB tempfs on the host.
It is mounted at /mnt/lfs and was clean before chapter 5 was built/installed
Usually, "only changed the difference" suggests that the builder
missed something. But in this case, I find it hard to imagine that
any of the major changes (adding libffi, meson, ninja, python3,
openssl) have affected file, which I generally class in Rincewind
style as "boring" (and much-appreciated because of that).
If I missed something it was adjusting the toolchain....The toolchain
test came back exactly what the book has.
I believe it was good before the adjust tool chain in chapter 6.
Something could have when wrong there but I have not uncovered anything
amiss.
Do you get the same problem with whichever version was in 8.1, or
with the current 5.33 ?
No it built, the only thing changed between the 8.1 and this is what is
in the book.
PS - we call them versions of the book, or releases. The word
'handbook' implies a certain non-GPL'd OS ;-)
ĸen
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
