On 07/03/2018 05:49 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:17:27PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
I think you answered a different question from the one I asked. I
don't care what worked in your 8.1 build, only whether all recent
versions of file show the problem in your current build.
And if they do, any other infromation you can gather will be useful.
ĸen
I am using the version of file that is in the LFS-8.2 book
It feels as if you are deliberately misunderstanding what I ask.
I'll reply to your other post.
Completely missing what you are saying. I am using the the LFS-8.2
handbook downloaded from the linuxfromscratch.org. I am following the
book using the versions AS OUTLINED in the handbook. Chapter 6.12 gives
the version as file-5.52 and I have no idea as to why you think I am
using anything else. I have built the tool chain ( chapter 5) and then
I am at this point in the build AGAIN following the LFS-8.2 handbook.
Anyway here is what I found:
I reran the the test from Chapter 6.10 and it gave this result
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
/lib64 is empty at this point in the build, so I proceeded with the
following
cd /lib64
cp /lib/ld-2.27.so .
ln -sf ld-2.27.so ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
Now /lib64 has the "ld files"
the configure in chapter 6.12. File-5.32
/configure --prefix=/usr
will now complete.
My question now is what should be in /lib64 at this point?
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
